From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Taxes" redirects here. For the biological term, see
Taxis.
A Tax is a financial charge or other levy imposed on an individual or a legal entity by a state or a functional equivalent of a state (for example, secessionist movements or revolutionary movements). Taxes are also imposed by many subnational entities. Taxes consist of direct tax or indirect tax, and may be paid in money
or as its labour equivalent (often but not always unpaid). A tax may be
defined as a "pecuniary burden laid upon individuals or property to
support the government […] a payment exacted by legislative authority."[1]
A tax "is not a voluntary payment or donation, but an enforced
contribution, exacted pursuant to legislative authority" and is "any
contribution imposed by government […] whether under the name of toll,
tribute, tallage, gabel, impost, duty, custom, excise, subsidy, aid,
supply, or other name."[1]
In modern taxation systems, taxes are levied in money, but in-kind and corvée
taxation are characteristic of traditional or pre-capitalist states and
their functional equivalents. The method of taxation and the government
expenditure of taxes raised is often highly debated in politics and economics. Tax collection is performed by a government agency such as Canada Revenue Agency, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States, or Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in the UK. When taxes are not fully paid, civil penalties (such as fines or forfeiture) or criminal penalties (such as incarceration)[2] may be imposed on the non-paying entity or individual.
Purposes and effects
Funds provided by taxation have been used by states and their
functional equivalents throughout history to carry out many functions.
Some of these include expenditures on war, the enforcement of law and public order, protection of property, economic infrastructure (roads, legal tender, enforcement of contracts, etc.), public works, social engineering, and the operation of government itself. Most modern governments also use taxes to fund welfare and public services. These services can include education systems, health care systems, pensions for the elderly, unemployment benefits, and public transportation. Energy, water and waste management systems are also common public utilities. Colonial and moderning states have also used cash taxes to draw or force reluctant subsistence producers into cash economies.
Governments use different kinds of taxes and vary the tax rates.
This is done to distribute the tax burden among individuals or classes
of the population involved in taxable activities, such as business, or to redistribute resources between individuals or classes in the population. Historically, the nobility were supported by taxes on the poor; modern social security
systems are intended to support the poor, the disabled, or the retired
by taxes on those who are still working. In addition, taxes are applied
to fund foreign and military aid, to influence the macroeconomic performance of the economy (the government's strategy for doing this is called its fiscal policy - see also tax exemption),
or to modify patterns of consumption or employment within an economy,
by making some classes of transaction more or less attractive.
A nations tax system is often a reflection of its communal values or
the values of those in power. To create a system of taxation, a nation
must make choices regarding the distribution of the tax burden — who
will pay taxes and how much they will pay — and how the taxes collected
will be spent. In democratic nations where the public elects those in
charge of establishing the tax system, these choices reflect the type
of community which the public wishes to create. In countries where the
public does not have a significant amount of influence over the system
of taxation, that system may be more of a reflection on the values of
those in power.
The resource collected from the public through taxation is always
greater than the amount which can be used by the government. The
difference is called compliance cost, and includes for example
the labour cost and other expenses incurred in complying with tax laws
and rules. The collection of a tax in order to spend it on a specified
purpose, for example collecting a tax on alcohol to pay directly for
alcoholism rehabilitation centres, is called hypothecation. This practice is often disliked by finance ministers,
since it reduces their freedom of action. Some economic theorists
consider the concept to be intellectually dishonest since (in reality)
money is fungible.
Furthermore, it often happens that taxes or excises initially levied to
fund some specific government programs are then later diverted to the
government general fund. In some cases, such taxes are collected in
fundamentally inefficient ways, for example highway tolls.
Some economists, especially neo-classical economists, argue that all taxation creates market distortion
and results in economic inefficiency. They have therefore sought to
identify the kind of tax system that would minimize this distortion.
Also, one of every government's most fundamental duties is to
administer possession and use of land in the geographic area over which
it is sovereign, and it is considered economically efficient for
government to recover for public purposes the additional value it
creates by providing this unique service.
Since governments also resolve commercial disputes, especially in countries with common law, similar arguments are sometimes used to justify a sales tax or value added tax. Others (e.g. libertarians)
argue that most or all forms of taxes are immoral due to their
involuntary (and therefore eventually coercive/violent) nature. The
most extreme anti-tax view is anarcho-capitalism, in which the provision of all social services should be a matter of voluntary private contracts.
The Four "R"s
Taxation has four main purposes or effects: Revenue, Redistribution, Repricing, and Representation.[3]
The main purpose is revenue:
taxes raise money to spend on roads, schools and hospitals, and on more
indirect government functions like good regulation or justice systems.
This is the most widely known function.[3]
A second is redistribution.
Normally, this means transferring wealth from the richer sections of
society to poorer sections. This function is widely accepted in most democracies, although the extent to which this should happen is always controversial.[3]
A third purpose of taxation is repricing. Taxes are levied to address externalities: tobacco is taxed, for example, to discourage smoking, and many people advocate policies such as implementing a carbon tax.[3]
A fourth, consequential effect of taxation in its historical setting has been representation.[3]
The American revolutionary slogan "no taxation without representation"
implied this: rulers tax citizens, and citizens demand accountability
from their rulers as the other part of this bargain. Several studies
have shown that direct taxation (such as income taxes) generates the greatest degree of accountability and better governance, while indirect taxation tends to have smaller effects.[4][5]
Proportional, progressive, and regressive
-
An important feature of tax systems is the percentage of the tax
burden as it relates to income or consumption. The terms progressive,
regressive, and proportional are used to describe the way the rate
progresses from low to high, from high to low, or proportionally. The
terms describe a distribution effect, which can be applied to any type
of tax system (income or consumption) that meets the definition. A progressive tax is a tax imposed so that the effective tax rate increases as the amount to which the rate is applied increases. The opposite of a progressive tax is a regressive tax, where the effective tax rate decreases as the amount to which the rate is applied increases. In between is a proportional tax,
where the effective tax rate is fixed as the amount to which the rate
is applied increases. The terms can also be used to apply meaning to
the taxation of select consumption, such as a tax on luxury goods and
the exemption of basic necessities may be described as having
progressive effects as it increases a tax burden on high end
consumption and decreases a tax burden on low end consumption.[6][7][8]
Direct and indirect
-
Taxes are sometimes referred to as direct tax or indirect tax. The
meaning of these terms can vary in different contexts, which can
sometimes lead to confusion. In economics, direct taxes refer
to those taxes that are collected from the people or organizations on
whom they are ostensibly imposed. For example, income taxes are
collected from the person who earns the income. By contrast, indirect
taxes are collected from someone other than the person ostensibly
responsible for paying the taxes. In law, the terms may have different
meanings. In U.S. constitutional law, for instance, direct taxes refer
to poll taxes and property taxes,
which are based on simple existence or ownership. Indirect taxes are
imposed on rights, privileges, and activities. Thus, a tax on the sale
of property would be considered an indirect tax, whereas the tax on
simply owning the property itself would be a direct tax. The
distinction can be subtle between direct and indirect taxation, but can
be important under the law.
Tax burden
-
Main article: Tax incidence
Diagram illustrating taxes effect
Law establishes from whom a tax is collected. In many countries, taxes are imposed on business (such as corporate taxes or portions of payroll taxes). However, who ultimately pays the tax (the tax "burden") is determined by the marketplace as taxes become embedded
into production costs. Depending on how quantities supplied and
demanded vary with price (the "elasticities" of supply and demand), a
tax can be absorbed by the seller (in the form of lower pre-tax
prices), or by the buyer (in the form of higher post-tax prices). If
the elasticity of supply is low, more of the tax will be paid by the
supplier. If the elasticity of demand is low, more will be paid by the
customer. And contrariwise for the cases where those elasticities are
high. If the seller is a competitive firm, the tax burden flows back to
the factors of production
depending on the elasticities thereof; this includes workers (in the
form of lower wages), capital investors (in the form of loss to
shareholders), landowners (in the form of lower rents) and
entrepreneurs (in the form of lower wages of superintendence).
To illustrate this relationship, suppose the market price of a product is US$1.00,
and that a $0.50 tax is imposed on the product that, by law, is to be
collected from the seller. If the product is a luxury (in the economic
sense of the term), a greater portion of the tax will be absorbed by
the seller.[citation needed]
For example, the seller might drop the price of the product to $0.70 so
that, after adding in the tax, the buyer pays a total of $1.20, or
$0.20 more than he did before the $0.50 tax was imposed. In this
example, the buyer has paid $0.20 of the $0.50 tax (in the form of a
post-tax price) and the seller has paid the remaining $0.30 (in the
form of a lower pre-tax price).[9]
Morality
According to many political views, activities funded by taxes can be beneficial to society and progressive taxation can be used in modern nation-states to the benefit of the majority of the population and social development.[10] Most arguments about taxation revolve around the degree and method of taxation and associated government spending, not taxation itself.[citation needed]
Some people, however, argue that compulsory taxation itself is inherently immoral, as it is the theft of property by the government since people are forced to pay.[11] These include objectivists[citation needed], anarcho-capitalists and classical liberals[citation needed].
Government theft
-
Because payment of tax is usually compulsory and enforced by the police and justice system, some capitalist political philosophies view taxation by force as institutionalized violence equivalent to theft, accusing the government of levying taxes via coercive means. Individualist anarchists, objectivists, anarcho-capitalists, and some libertarians see taxation as government aggression (see Zero Aggression Principle). The libertarian writer Jason C. Reeher echoed the sentiments of Murray Rothbard on these grounds; in criticizing his local school district's relatively small property tax increase, Reeher said that "(t)he thief who steals the least is still a thief."[verification needed]
Under this view, taxes are paid individually and therefore, to be
considered voluntary, in any meaningful way, should be levied only with
the consent of the individual. Some libertarians[who?] recommend a minimal level of taxation in order to maximize the protection of liberty, while others prefer market alternatives such as private defense agencies, arbitration
agencies or voluntary contributions. Others claim that the examples
where taxation and the state function of civil protection has collapsed
and replaced by private defense agencies (such as in countries like Somalia), the results have been largely positive.[12]
Democratic defense
One counter-argument is that in a democracy,
because the government is the party performing the act of imposing
taxes, society as a whole decides how the tax system should be
organised. The American Revolution's "No taxation without representation"
slogan implied this view. The same argument could be made from a
monarchist perspective: since the King embodies the nation, the nation
as a whole decides how the tax system should be organised. Similar
arguments can be made to justify taxation under any form of government,
including dictatorships and oligarchies.
According to Ludwig von Mises, "society as a whole" should not make such decisions, due to methodological individualism.[13] Under this view, the moral stature of an act, such as enslavement or theft is not contingent upon its legality or popularity, but rather its morality. Thomas Jefferson argued that, "A direct democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine."[14]
Land Tax defense
Advocates of land value taxation argue that sovereign rights over the products of labour and capital do not apply to land. John Locke wrote in Essay on Civil Government
(1690) that: "When the sacredness of property is talked of, it should
be remembered that any such sacredness does not belong in the same
degree to landed property." Henry George
elaborated this to claim: "Here are two simple principles, both of
which are self-evident: I.—That all men have equal rights to the use
and enjoyment of the elements provided by Nature. II.—That each man has
an exclusive right to the use and enjoyment of what is produced by his
own labor" (Protection or Free Trade, 1886).
Justification
Defenders of taxation argue that taxation of business
is justified on the grounds that the commercial activity necessarily
involves use of publicly established and maintained economic
infrastructure, and that businesses are in effect charged for this use.[citation needed] Compulsory taxation of individuals, such as income tax, is argued to be justified on similar grounds, including territorial sovereignty, and the social contract.
A libertarian response is that government services used by people are
either already paid for directly or are services that ought to be
provided by a free market. Such taxes, they argue, are a way for the
rulers to exploit the people.
History
Taxation levels
Egyptian peasants seized for non-payment of taxes. (Pyramid Age)
The first known system of taxation was in Ancient Egypt around 3000 BC - 2800 BC in the first dynasty of the Old Kingdom.[15]
Records from the time document that the pharaoh would conduct a
biennial tour of the kingdom, collecting tax revenues from the people.
Early taxation is also described in the Bible. In Genesis (chapter 47, verse 24 - the New International Version), it states "But when the crop comes in, give a fifth of it to Pharaoh. The other four-fifths you may keep as seed for the fields and as food for yourselves and your households and your children." Joseph was telling the people of Egypt how to divide their crop, providing a portion to the Pharaoh. A share (20%) of the crop was the tax.
In India, Islamic rulers imposed jizya starting in the 11th century. It was abolished by Akbar.
Quite a few records of government tax collection in Europe since at
least the 17th century are still available today. But taxation levels
are hard to compare to the size and flow of the economy since production
numbers are not as readily available. Government expenditures and
revenue in France during the 17th century went from about 24.30 million
livres in 1600-10 to about 126.86 million livres in 1650-59 to about 117.99 million livres in 1700-10 when government debt had reached 1.6 billion livres. In 1780-89 it reached 421.50 million livres. [16] Taxation as a percentage of production of final goods may have reached 15% - 20% during the 17th century in places like France, the Netherlands, and Scandinavia.
During the war-filled years of the eighteenth and early nineteenth
century, tax rates in Europe increased dramatically as war became more
expensive and governments became more centralized and adept at
gathering taxes. This increase was greatest in England, Peter Mathias and Patrick O'Brien
found that the tax burden increased by 85% over this period. Another
study confirmed this number, finding that per capita tax revenues had
grown almost sixfold over the eighteenth century, but that steady
economic growth had made the real burden on each individual only double
over this period before the industrial revolution. Average tax rates were higher in Britain than France the years before the French Revolution,
twice in per capita income comparison, but they were mostly placed on
international trade. In France, taxes were lower but the burden was
mainly on landowners, individuals, and internal trade and thus created
far more resentment.[17]
Taxation as a percentage of GDP in 2003 was 56.1% in Denmark, 54.5% in France, 49.0% in the Euro area, 42.6% in the United Kingdom, 35.7% in the United States, 35.2% in The Republic of Ireland, and among all OECD members an average of 40.7%.[18][19]
Forms of taxation
In monetary economies prior to fiat banking, a critical form of taxation was seigniorage, the tax on the creation of money.
Other obsolete forms of taxation include:
- Scutage - paid in lieu
of military service; strictly speaking a commutation of a non-tax
obligation rather than a tax as such, but functioning as a tax in
practice
- Tallage - a tax on feudal dependents
- Tithe - a tax-like payment
(one tenth of one's earnings or agricultural produce), paid to the
Church (and thus too specific to be a tax in strict technical terms).
This should not be confused with the modern practice of the same name
which is normally voluntary, although churches have sought it
forcefully at times.
- Aids - During feudal times a feudal aid was a type of tax or due paid by a vassal to his lord.
- Danegeld - medieval land tax originally raised to pay off raiding Danes and later used to fund military expenditures.
- Carucage - tax which replaced the danegeld in England.
- Tax Farming - the principle of assigning the responsibility for tax revenue collection to private citizens or groups.
Some principalities taxed windows, doors, or cabinets to reduce
consumption of imported glass and hardware. Armoires, hutches, and
wardrobes were employed to evade taxes on doors and cabinets. In
extraordinary circumstances, taxes are also used to enforce public
policy like congestion charge (to cut road traffic and encourage public
transport) in London. In Tsarist Russia, taxes were clamped on beards.
Today, one of the most complicated taxation-systems worldwide is in
Germany. Three quarters of the world's taxation-literature refers to
the German system. There are 118 laws, 185 forms, and 96,000
regulations, spending €3.7
billion to collect the income tax. Today, governments of advanced
economies of EU, North America, and others rely more on direct taxes,
while those of developing economies of India, Africa, and others rely
more on indirect taxes.
Tax rates
-
Taxes are most often levied as a percentage, called the tax rate.
An important distinction when talking about tax rates is to distinguish
between the marginal rate and the effective (average) rate. The
effective rate is the total tax paid divided by the total amount the
tax is paid on, while the marginal rate is the rate paid on the next
dollar of income earned. For example, if income is taxed on a formula
of 5% from $0 up to $50,000, 10% from $50,000 to $100,000, and 15% over
$100,000, a taxpayer with income of $175,000 would pay a total of $18,750 in taxes.
- Tax calculation
- ((0.05*50,000) + (0.10*50,000) + (0.15*75,000)) = 18,750
- The "effective rate" would be 10.7%:
- (18,750/175,000) = 0.107
- The "marginal rate" would be 15%.
Deadweight costs of taxation
For goods supplied in a perfectly competitive market, tax reduces economic efficiency, by introducing a deadweight loss. In a perfect market, the price of a particular economic good
adjusts to make sure that all trades which benefit both the buyer and
the seller of a good occur. After introducing a tax, the price received
by the seller is less than the cost to the buyer. This means that fewer
trades occur and that the individuals or businesses involved gain less
from participating in the market. This destroys value, and is known as
the 'deadweight cost of taxation'.
The deadweight cost is dependent on the elasticity of supply and demand for a good.
Most taxes — including income tax and sales tax
— can have significant deadweight costs. The only way to avoid
deadweight costs in an economy which is generally competitive is to
find taxes which do not change economic incentives, such as the land value tax[20], where the tax is on a good in completely inelastic supply, or a lump sum tax. To do so is very difficult: the closest approximations are a poll tax paid by all adults regardless of their choices, or a windfall tax which is entirely unanticipated and so cannot affect decisions.
Double dividend taxes
In some cases where the economy is not perfectly competitive, the existence of a tax can increase economic efficiency. If there is a negative externality
associated with a good, meaning that it has negative effects not felt
by the consumer, then the free market will trade too much of that good.
By putting a tax on the good, the government can increase overall
welfare as well as raising revenue in taxation. This is known as a
'double dividend'.
There are a wide range of goods where there is, or is claimed to be, a negative externality. Polluting fuels (like petrol), goods which incur public healthcare costs (such as alcohol or tobacco), and charges for existing 'free' public goods (like congestion charging) all offer the possibility of a double dividend. This type of tax is a Pigovian tax, sometimes colloquially known as a 'sin tax'.
It is worthwhile noting that taxation is not necessarily the only, or
the best, method of dealing with negative externalities.
Optimal taxation theory
Most governments need revenue which exceeds that which can be
provided by non-distortionary taxes or through taxes which give a
double dividend. Optimal taxation theory is the branch of economics
that considers how taxes can be structured to give the least deadweight
costs, or to give the best outcomes in terms of social welfare.
Ramsey optimal taxation deals with minimising deadweight costs. Because deadweight costs are related to the elasticity
of supply and demand for a good, it follows that putting the highest
tax rates on the goods for which there is most inelastic supply and
demand will result in the least overall deadweight costs.
Some economists have sought to integrate optimal tax theory with the social welfare function,
which is the economic expression of the idea that equality is valuable
to a greater or lesser extent. If individuals experience diminishing returns from income, then the optimum distribution of income for society involves a progressive income tax. Mirrlees optimal income tax is a detailed theoretical model of the optimum progressive income tax along these lines.
Over the last years the validity of the theory of optimal taxation
was discussed by many political economists. Canegrati (2007)
demonstrated that if we move from the assumption that governments do
not maximise the welfare of society but the probability of winning
elections, in equilibrium tax rates are lower for the most powerful
groups of society (and not for the poorest as in the optimal theory of
direct taxation developed by Atkinson and Stiglitz).
Transparency and simplicity
Another concern is that the complicated tax codes of developed economies offer perverse economic incentives. The more details of tax policy there are, the more opportunities for legal tax avoidance and illegal tax evasion;
these not only result in lost revenue, but involve additional
deadweight costs: for instance, payments made for tax advice are
essentially deadweight costs because they add no wealth to the economy.
Perverse incentives also occur because of non-taxable 'hidden'
transactions; for instance, a sale from one company to another might be
liable for sales tax, but if the same goods were shipped from one branch of a corporation to another, no tax would be payable.
To address these issues, economists often suggest simple and
transparent tax structures which avoid providing loopholes. Sales tax,
for instance, can be replaced with a value added tax which disregards intermediate transactions.
Economics of tax incidence
Economic theory suggests that the economic effect of tax does not
necessarily fall at the point where it is legally levied. For instance,
a tax on employment paid by employers will impact on the employee, at
least in the long run. The greatest share of the tax burden tends to
fall on the most inelastic factor involved - the part of the
transaction which is affected least by a change in price. So, for
instance, a tax on wages in a town will (at least in the long run)
affect property-owners in that area.
Costs of compliance
Although governments must spend money on tax collection activities,
some of the costs, particularly for keeping records and filling out
forms, are borne by businesses and by private individuals. These are
collectively called costs of compliance. More complex tax systems tend
to have higher costs of compliance. This fact can be used as the basis
for practical or moral arguments in favor of tax simplification (see,
for example, FairTax), or tax elimination (in addition to moral arguments described above).
Kinds of taxes
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) publishes perhaps the most comprehensive analysis of worldwide
tax systems. In order to do this it has created a comprehensive
categorisation of all taxes in all regimes which it covers:[21]
Ad valorem
-
An ad valorem tax is one where the tax base is the value of a
good, service, or property. Sales taxes, tariffs, property taxes,
inheritance taxes, and value added taxes are different types of ad
valorem tax. An ad valorem tax is typically imposed at the time of a
transaction (sales tax or value added tax (VAT)) but it may be imposed
on an annual basis (property tax) or in connection with another
significant event (inheritance tax or tariffs). An alternative to ad
valorem taxation is an excise tax, where the tax base is the quantity
of something, regardless of its price. For example, in the United Kingdom,
a tax is collected on the sale of alcoholic drinks that is calculated
by volume and beverage type, rather than the price of the drink.
Environment Affecting Tax
This includes natural resources consumption tax, GreenHouse gas tax (Carbon tax, "sulfuric tax", etc), and others. see Ecotax, Gas-guzzler, and Polluter pays principle for more information.
Capital gains tax
-
A capital gains tax is the tax levied on the profit released upon the sale of a capital asset. In many cases, the amount of a capital gain
is treated as income and subject to the marginal rate of income tax.
However, in an inflationary environment, capital gains may be to some
extent illusory: if prices in general have doubled in five years, then
selling an asset for twice the price it was purchased for five years
earlier represents no gain at all. Partly to compensate for such
changes in the value of money over time, some jurisdictions, such as
the United States,
give a favorable capital gains tax rate based on the length of holding.
European jurisdictions have a similar rate reduction to nil on certain
property transactions that qualify for the participation exemption. In
Canada, 50% of the gain is taxable income. In India, Short Term Capital
Gains Tax (arising before 1 year) is 10% flat rate of the gains and
Long Term Capital Gains Tax is nil for stocks & mutual fund units
held 1 year or more and 20% for any other assets held 3 years or more.
If such a tax is levied on inherited property, it can act as a de facto probate or inheritance tax.
Consumption tax
-
A consumption tax is a tax on non-investment spending, and can be
implemented by means of a sales tax or by modifying an income tax to
allow for unlimited deductions for investment or savings.
Corporation tax
-
Main article: Corporate tax
Corporate tax refers to a direct tax levied by various jurisdictions
on the profits made by companies or associations and often includes
capital gains of a company.
Earnings are generally considered gross revenue less expenses.
Corporate expenses that relate to capital expenditures are usually
deducted in full (for example, trucks are fully deductible in the
Canadian tax system, while a corporate sports car is only partly
deductible). They are often deducted over the useful life of the asset
purchase. Notably, accounting rules about deductible expenses and tax
rules about deductible expense will differ at times, giving rise to
book-tax differences. If the book-tax difference is carried over more
than a year, it is referred to as a temporary difference, which then
creates deferred tax assets and liabilities for the corporation, which are carried on the balance sheet.
- See also: Excess profits tax, Windfall profits tax
Excises
-
Unlike an ad valorem, an excise is not a function of the
value of the product being taxed. Excise taxes are based on the
quantity, not the value, of product purchased. For example, in the
United States, the Federal government imposes an excise tax of 18.4
cents per US gallon (4.86¢/L) of gasoline, while state governments levy
an additional 8 to 28 cents per US gallon. Excises on particular
commodities are frequently hypothecated. For example, a fuel excise (use tax) is often used to pay for public transportation, especially roads and bridges
and for the protection of the environment. A special form of
hypothecation arises where an excise is used to compensate a party to a
transaction for alleged uncontrollable abuse; for example, a blank media tax is a tax on recordable media such as CD-Rs, whose proceeds are typically allocated to copyright
holders. Critics charge that such taxes blindly tax those who make
legitimate and illegitimate usages of the products; for instance, a
person or corporation using CD-R's for data archival should not have to
subsidize the producers of popular music.
Excises (or exemptions from them) are also used to modify consumption patterns (social engineering). For example, a high excise is used to discourage alcohol
consumption, relative to other goods. This may be combined with
hypothecation if the proceeds are then used to pay for the costs of
treating illness caused by alcohol abuse. Similar taxes may exist on tobacco, pornography, etc., and they may be collectively referred to as "sin taxes". A carbon tax
is a tax on the consumption of carbon-based non-renewable fuels, such
as petrol, diesel-fuel, jet fuels, and natural gas. The object is to
reduce the release of carbon into the atmosphere. In the United
Kingdom, vehicle excise duty is an annual tax on vehicle ownership.
Income tax
-
An income tax is a tax levied on the financial income of persons, corporations, or other legal entities. Various income tax systems exist, with varying degrees of tax incidence.
Income taxation can be progressive, proportional, or regressive. When
the tax is levied on the income of companies, it is often called a corporate tax,
corporate income tax, or corporation tax. Individual income taxes often
tax the total income of the individual (with some deductions
permitted), while corporate income taxes often tax net income (the
difference between gross receipts, expenses, and additional write-offs).
The "tax net" refers to the types of payment that are taxed, which included personal earnings (wages), capital gains,
and business income. The rates for different types of income may vary
and some may not be taxed at all. Capital gains may be taxed when
realized (e.g. when shares are sold) or when incurred (e.g. when shares
appreciate in value). Business income may only be taxed if it is
significant or based on the manner in which it is paid. Some types of
income, such as interest on bank savings, may be considered as personal
earnings (similar to wages) or as a realized property gain (similar to
selling shares). In some tax systems, personal earnings may be strictly
defined where labor, skill, or investment is required (e.g. wages); in
others, they may be defined broadly to include windfalls (e.g. gambling
wins).
Personal income tax is often collected on a pay-as-you-earn basis, with small corrections made soon after the end of the tax year. These corrections take one of two forms: payments to the government, for taxpayers who have not paid enough during the tax year; and tax refunds
from the government for those who have overpaid. Income tax systems
will often have deductions available that lessen the total tax
liability by reducing total taxable income. They may allow losses from
one type of income to be counted against another. For example, a loss
on the stock market may be deducted against taxes paid on wages. Other
tax systems may isolate the loss, such that business losses can only be
deducted against business tax by carrying forward the loss to later tax
years.
Inheritance tax
-
Inheritance tax, estate tax, and death tax or duty are the names
given to various taxes which arise on the death of an individual. In
United States tax law, there is a distinction between an estate tax and
an inheritance tax: the former taxes the personal representatives of
the deceased, while the latter taxes the beneficiaries of the estate.
However, this distinction does not apply in other jurisdictions; for
example, if using this terminology UK inheritance tax would be an
estate tax.
- See also: Allodial, Pigovian tax, Estate tax (United States), Inheritance Tax (United Kingdom).
Poll tax
-
A poll tax, also called a per capita tax, or capitation tax, is a tax that levies a set amount per individual. One of the earliest taxes mentioned in the Bible
of a half-shekel per annum from each adult Jew (Ex. 30:11-16) was a
form of poll tax. Poll taxes are administratively cheap because they
are easy to compute and collect and difficult to cheat. Economists have
considered poll taxes economically efficient because people are
presumed to be in fixed supply. However, poll taxes are very unpopular
because poorer people pay a higher proportion of their income than
richer people. In addition, the supply of people is in fact not fixed
over time: on average, couples will choose to have fewer children if a
poll tax is imposed[citation needed]. The introduction of a poll tax in medieval England was the primary cause of the 1381 Peasants' Revolt,
and in England and Wales in 1990 the change from a progressive local
taxation based on property values to a single-rate form of taxation
regardless of ability to pay (the Community Charge, but more popularly referred to as the Poll Tax).
Property tax
-
Main article: Property tax
A property tax is a tax imposed on property by reason of its
ownership. A property tax is usually levied on the value of property
owned. There are three species of property: land, improvements to land
(immovable man-made things, e.g. buildings) and personal property
(movable things). Real estate or realty is the combination of land and
improvements to land.
Property taxes may be charged on a recurrent basis (e.g., yearly). A
common type of property tax is an annual charge on the ownership of real estate, where the tax base is the estimated value of the property. For a period of over 150 years from 1695 a window tax was levied in England, with the result that one can still see listed buildings
with windows bricked up in order to save their owners money. A similar
tax on hearths existed in France and elsewhere, with similar results.
The two most common type of event driven property taxes are stamp duty, charged upon change of ownership, and inheritance tax, which is imposed in many countries on the estates of the deceased.
In contrast with a tax on real estate (land and buildings), a land value tax
is levied only on the unimproved value of the land ("land" in this
instance may mean either the economic term, i.e., all natural
resources, or the natural resources associated with specific areas of
the earth's surface: "lots" or "land parcels").
When real estate is held by a higher government unit or some other
entity not subject to taxation by the local government, the taxing
authority may receive a payment in lieu of taxes to compensate it for some or all of the foregone tax revenue.
In many jurisdictions (including many American states), there is a general tax levied periodically on residents who own personal property
(personalty) within the jurisdiction. Vehicle and boat registration
fees are subsets of this kind of tax. The tax is often designed with
blanket coverage and large exceptions for things like food and
clothing. Household goods are often exempt when kept or used within the
household.[citation needed] Any otherwise non-exempt object can lose its exemption if regularly kept outside the household.[citation needed]
Thus, tax collectors often monitor newspaper articles for stories about
wealthy people who have lent art to museums for public display, because
the artworks have then become subject to personal property tax.[citation needed] If an artwork had to be sent to another state for some touch-ups, it may have become subject to personal property tax in that state as well.[citation needed]
Retirement tax
Some countries with social security
systems, which provide income to retired workers, fund those systems
with specific dedicated taxes. These often differ from comprehensive
income taxes in that they are levied only on specific sources of
income, generally wages and salary (in which case they are called payroll taxes).
A further difference is that the total amount of the taxes paid by or
on behalf of a worker is typically considered in the calculation of the
retirement benefits to which that worker is entitled. Examples of
retirement taxes include the FICA tax, a payroll tax that is collected from employers and employees in the United States to fund the country's Social Security system; and the National Insurance Contributions (NICs) collected from employers and employees in the United Kingdom to fund the country's national insurance system.
These taxes are sometimes regressive in their immediate effect. For
example, in the United States, each worker, whatever his or her income,
pays at the same rate up to a specified cap, but income over the cap is
not taxed. A further regressive feature is that such taxes often
exclude investment earnings and other forms of income that are more
likely to be received by the wealthy. The regressive effect is somewhat
offset, however, by the eventual benefit payments, which typically
replace a higher percentage of a lower-paid worker's pre-retirement
income.
Sales tax
-
Sales taxes are a form of excise levied when a commodity is sold to
its final consumer. Retail organizations contend that such taxes
discourage retail sales. The question of whether they are generally
progressive or regressive is a subject of much current debate. People
with higher incomes spend a lower proportion of them, so a flat-rate
sales tax will tend to be regressive. It is therefore common to exempt
food, utilities and other necessities from sales taxes, since poor
people spend a higher proportion of their incomes on these commodities,
so such exemptions would make the tax more progressive. This is the
classic "You pay for what you spend" tax, as only those who spend money
on non-exempt (i.e. luxury) items pay the tax.
A small number of US states rely entirely on sales taxes for state
revenue, as those states do not levy a state income tax. Such states
tend to have a moderate to large amount of tourism or inter-state
travel that occurs within their borders, allowing the state to benefit
from taxes from people the state would otherwise not tax. In this way,
the state is able to reduce the tax burden on its citizens. The US
states that do not levy a state income tax are Alaska, Tennessee,
Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas,[23]
Washington state, and Wyoming. Additionally, New Hampshire and
Tennessee levy state income taxes only on dividends and interest
income. Of the above states, only Alaska and New Hampshire do not levy
a state sales tax. Additional information can be obtained at the Federation of Tax Administrators website.
In the United States, there is a growing movement for the
replacement of all federal payroll and income taxes (both corporate and
personal) with a national retail sales tax and monthly tax rebate to
households of citizens and legal resident aliens. The tax proposal is
named FairTax. In Canada,
the federal sales tax is called the Goods and Services tax (GST) and
now stands at 5%. The provinces of British Columbia, Saskatchewan,
Manitoba, Ontario and Prince Edward Island also have a provincial sales
tax [PST]. The provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and
Newfoundland & Labrador have harmonized their provincial sales
taxes with the GST - Harmonized Sales Tax [HST], and thus is a full
VAT. The province of Quebec collects the Quebec Sales Tax [QST] which
is based on the GST with certain differences. Most businesses can claim
back the GST, HST and QST they pay, and so effectively it is the final
consumer who pays the tax.
Tariffs
-
An import or export tariff (also called customs duty or impost) is a
charge for the movement of goods through a political border. Tariffs
discourage trade, and they may
be used by governments to protect domestic industries. A proportion of
tariff revenues is often hypothecated to pay government to maintain a
navy or border police. The classic ways of cheating a tariff are smuggling or declaring a false value of goods. Tax, tariff and trade rules in modern times are usually set together because of their common impact on industrial policy, investment policy, and agricultural policy. A trade bloc
is a group of allied countries agreeing to minimize or eliminate
tariffs against trade with each other, and possibly to impose
protective tariffs on imports from outside the bloc. A customs union
has a common external tariff, and, according to an agreed formula, the
participating countries share the revenues from tariffs on goods
entering the customs union.
Toll
-
A toll is a tax or fee charged to travel via a road, bridge, tunnel
or other route. Historically tolls have been used to pay for state
bridge, road and tunnel projects. They have also been used in privately
constructed transport links. The toll is likely to be a fixed charge,
possibly graduated for vehicle type, or for distance on long routes.
Shunpiking is the
practice of finding another route to avoid payment of tolls. In some
situations where tolls were increased or felt to be unreasonably high,
informal shunpiking by individuals escalated into a form of boycott by regular users, with the goal of applying the financial stress of lost toll revenue to the authority determining the levy.
Transfer tax
-
Main article: Transfer tax
Historically, in many countries, a contract needed to have a stamp
affixed to make it valid. The charge for the stamp was either a fixed
amount or a percentage of the value of the transaction. In most
countries the stamp has been abolished but stamp duty
remains. Stamp duty is levied in the UK on the purchase of shares and
securities, the issue of bearer instruments, and certain partnership
transactions. Its modern derivatives, stamp duty reserve tax and stamp duty land tax,
are respectively charged on transactions involving securities and land.
Stamp duty has the effect of discouraging speculative purchases of
assets by decreasing liquidity. In the US
transfer tax is often charged by the state or local government and (in
the case of real property transfers) can be tied to the recording of
the deed or other transfer documents. Taxes on currency transactions
are known as Tobin taxes.
- See also: Stamp duty
Value Added Tax / Goods and Services Tax
-
A value added tax (VAT), also known as 'Goods and Services Tax'
(G.S.T), or 'Impuesto Indirecto sobre la Prestacion de Servicios'
(I.S.I.), Single Business Tax, or Turnover Tax in some countries,
applies the equivalent of a sales tax to every operation that creates
value. To give an example, sheet steel is imported by a machine
manufacturer. That manufacturer will pay the VAT on the purchase price,
remitting that amount to the government. The manufacturer will then
transform the steel into a machine, selling the machine for a higher
price to a wholesale distributor. The manufacturer will collect the VAT
on the higher price, but will remit to the government only the excess
related to the "value added" (the price over the cost of the sheet
steel). The wholesale distributor will then continue the process,
charging the retail distributor the VAT on the entire price to the
retailer, but remitting only the amount related to the distribution
mark-up to the government. The last VAT amount is paid by the eventual
retail customer who cannot recover any of the previously paid VAT. For
a VAT and sales tax of identical rates, the total tax paid is the same,
but it is paid at differing points in the process.
VAT is usually administrated by requiring the company to complete a
VAT return, giving details of VAT it has been charged (referred to as
input tax) and VAT it has charged to others (referred to as output
tax). The difference between output tax and input tax is payable to the
Local Tax Authority. If input tax is greater than output tax the
company can claim back money from the Local Tax Authority. VAT was
historically used to counter evasion
in a sales tax or excise. By collecting the tax at each production
level, the theory is that the entire economy helps in the enforcement.
However, forged invoices and similar evasion methods have demonstrated
that there are always those who will attempt to evade taxation.
Economic theorists have argued that the collection process of VAT
minimises the market distortion resulting from the tax, compared to a
sales tax. However, VAT is held by some to discourage production.
Wealth (net worth) tax
-
Some countries' governments will require declaration of the tax payers' balance sheet (assets and liabilities), and from that exact a tax on net worth
(assets minus liabilities), as a percentage of the net worth, or a
percentage of the net worth exceeding a certain level. The tax is in
place for both "natural" and in some cases legal "persons".
See also
By country or region
Notes
- ^ a b Black's Law Dictionary, p. 1307 (5th ed. 1979).
- ^ See, e.g., 26 U.S.C. § 7203 in the case of U.S. Federal taxes.
- ^ a b c d e "Tax, Governance, Corporate Responsibility and Accountability". Tax Justice Network. Retrieved on 2007-09-30.
- ^ Cobham, Alex (2007-01). "The tax consensus has failed!". The Oxford Council on Good Governance. Retrieved on 2007-09-30.
- ^ Ross, Michael, L. (2007-01-27). "Does Taxation Lead to Representation?". UCLA Department of Political Science. Retrieved on 2007-09-30.
- ^ Internal Revenue Service
- ^ luxury tax - Britannica Online Encyclopedia
- ^ http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282(196909)59%3A4%3C596%3ACEASTR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3
- ^ Parkin, Michael (2006), Principles of Microeconomics, p. 134.
- ^ Population and Social Integration Section (PSIS), United Nations Social and Economic Commission for Asia and the Pacific
- ^ Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand; Signet; (September 1996) ISBN 0-451-19114-5
- ^ The Rule of Law Without the State, Ludwig Von Mises Institute
- ^ Human Action Chapter II. Sec. 4. The Principle of Methodological Individualism by Ludwig von Mises
- ^ Thomas Jefferson quotes, ThinkExist.com
- ^ Taxes in the Ancient World, University of Pennsylvania Almanac, Vol. 48, No. 28, April 2, 2002
- ^ Hoffman, Phillipe and Kathryn Norberg (1994), Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450-1789, p. 238.
- ^ Hoffman, Phillipe and Kathryn Norberg (1994), Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450-1789, p. 300 .
- ^ "OECD national accounts". Retrieved on 2007-03-01.
- ^ Tax/Spending Burden, Forbes magazine, 05-24-04
- ^ Land Value Taxation: An Applied Analysis, William J. McCluskey, Riël C. D. Franzsen
- ^ The OECD Classification of Taxes and Interpretative Guide, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004
- ^ "OECD Tax Database". Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved on 2007-01-30.
- ^ Although Texas has no individual income tax, the state does impose a franchise tax
— soon to be replaced by a margin tax — on business activity that,
while not denominated as an income tax, is in substance a kind of
income tax.
External links